I don't think the VC used on the features should be reimbursed since the point

Comments · 401 Views

I don't think the VC used on the features should be reimbursed since the point

Insert the respec feature. I know someone already commented this, but I'd love to add more of a reason. First off it would make life so much easier and save so much time and effort if we can tune our builds up instead of wasting more of NBA 2K21 MT for sale our money and making a whole additional one. Second, this attribute shouldn't give gamers the ability to recreate whole builds (e.g. change from a PG playmaker into some C Glass) I feel that it must be a way for gamers to correct their MyPlayers characteristics after it was created to provide much better badges or cartoons that this includes height, weight, wingspan, and possibly takeover.

Thirdly, I don't think the VC used on the features should be reimbursed since the point I made in my second reason is that respecing should let us fine-tune our players never make something new and knowing that this community someone will most definitely find a VC glitch if it had been reimbursed. Lastly, I created my own build with this feature in my mind so that I did not put much thought behind the creation of the construct and just wanted to try and see so that I could adjust the way the game played and my build for my play style and it. I really don't know if anyone else also had this thought process but wanted to put my own personal reason for wanting it.Our teammates look like they have not played with basketball for more than 4 weeks. Offball movement is clumsy and insistent - particularly when freelancing from a play that is broken spacing is always off. On breaks that are quick, your teammate is far more likely to bring a pull that is contested. Defensively, I've seen defensive players watch opponents go on fast breaks, particularly beyond them and stand by. My gripe here is that each team plays with essentially the exact same manner. Run one or two plays and then everything goes off the rails as soon as that superstar player leaves the courtroom.

Defensively, they play man defense until my participant produces a few shots in a row (or has three assists) and that I spend the rest of the match being double teamed on catch and being hauled off ball. It reduces me scoring 50 points since, yet again, that the AI does not adapt. It does not matter the team, the coach, or the playstyle. What are these tendency sliders doing if not making the teams play in a way that is unique? I'd much rather score 25 a game in a variety of ways, and more assists than easily average 50 because if I want to find the ball I must backdoor all day. It destroys the experience.

I am blowing out the other team anyways, up 30 from the fourth quarter. Perhaps call the dual team/instant trap hounds off. I am tempted to take slippery off ball (which otherwise seems unnecessary) specifically since this makes the sport so unfun. Winning becomes a job. And if you pass to your teammates a great deal, they will find a way to dismiss the match; once again because the logic they use is awful.

Stop making us pay an increasing number of money every year to make our gamers usable. Making VC costs higher DOES NOT deter individuals from buying. And stop saying"you don't need to buy VC." I'd love to not purchase VC, but if there's the option to do it, there are those out there who can take action, which compels everyone else to buy VC so we can remain competitive. Yes, microtransactions are part of the industry, but every sport uses them for other things that have no impact on gameplay and makeup. My suggestion would be to maintain VC, but make it VC is just for buying clothes, haircuts, animations, etc.. Please please please stop making us pay an additional $50 just to be able to play online. You're a monopoly in the basketball gaming market, please prevent taking advantage of your clients who take care of the sport despite the fact that you don't seem to buy 2K21 MT take care of the consumers.

Comments