I believe according to your comment that Mut 21 coins we are going to fundamentally disagree on idealism vs. realism, and that's okay. I find myself generally at the middle of realism and idealism since I understand how the world works but I want a better universe; you do not need to pick one or the other. I don't understand why we have to give corporations a pass simply as they aren't people (that Citizens United would disagree with but that's another discussion.) We should not only accept the best we're given by a company, we should anticipate the best we need out of these. Companies are made of humans calling the shots and there are an infinite amount of examples of organizations that make massive profits and stand up for great causes. Patagonia is an excellent example. They don't have to create sustainable products and supply repair and reuse apps to go against quickly trend, but they do and they make a lot of money .

This instance doesn't include the many gray topics where remarks have a location; this is literally a discussion of if you want black folks to have rights or not. It is not courageous of a company to say that black men and women deserve rights simply because they will lose white supremacist customers. It really is quite easy for a company to set out a statement of opinion like this, as we've seen from all of the businesses doing this at this time like Amazon and the NFL. I genuinely don't understand how it's hard to get a multi-million dollar company to give up a tiny fraction of the profits for the greater good. If people who do not like Black Lives Matter constitute a Vast Majority of a Organization's customerbase, then perhaps they shouldn't have those profits (not claiming EA's playerbase from BLM, this really is a hyperbolized example)

Why not encourage them in performing both? Since we have not seen them doing both. Back up your words. Sony handled things better than EA by not only using a statement, but heading after All Lives Matter supporters in remarks, fitting donations by a few workers, claiming they'll have more in the coming week, and allegedly forming a studio in San Diego led by POC developers. They could have either held the announcement until they had something to show, or told us what they're planning. At the end of the day should you refuse to acknowledge when a company creates a little measure you love then how do they ever learn to generate a large step you love?

Are you currently treating a company such as how a parent speaks about a young child? I genuinely don't understand why it is our responsibility to baby companies into having compassion. Why do they need to"learn" to do good for humanity, why not they just do it? It's just like white folks putting the responsibility on black people to educate them not to be displaced when there's lots of resources out there on how to cheap Madden 21 coins perform it. With that said, I do want to say that I apologize if any of my remark comes off as hostile or attacking to you. I appreciate this discussion a lot even if I believe at the end of this we will still disagree. I would say most sensible people fall somewhere between realism and idealism. I hope that I am not making a strawman from your argument when I say you see hardly any value in creating a statement with nothing to back this up. Whereas when a large company makes a formal statement I think that conveys a reasonable bit of weight even if they don't do anything else.